![]() ![]() The UI of "closing discord" should be separate from "closing a tab", even if the implementation is the same □.Support for running these sites minimized, visually separate from regular tabs.Firefox has these, despite not supporting PWA in full. Maybe not full separate windows, but at least make the "Low Battery Mode" website per-site □.Beginning to isolate certain (user-requested) sites from others. ![]() Most of these don't have to be done in any particular order: This can probably be split up into several different steps. Who in their right minds wouldn't want a lighter alternative to Discord & Spotify? □ However, think of the potential! Even if users don't choose to use Orion as their main browser, they are almost certain to be tempted by this feature. Something like Progressive Web Apps, even for websites that weren't designed for it in the first place □ I'm basically asking you to make Orion support "background sites" as an alternative to Electron. In particular, I would like to have Discord enabled in the background (in a separate user-visible window) and specifically instructed to use low battery mode (independent of the main browser)Ī lot of this is probably hard. What would be absolutely amazing, is if we could have some of these PWA features enabled for normal sites □ ![]() However, as I understand it, progressive web apps have to be enabled by the website author themselves. Seperate windows, able to be minimized indepedentently of the main browser.Background service workers & notifications.Shared resources with the main browser process.However, other Electron apps like Spotify, VS Code, and Mailspring display many of these tendencies too □įor Electron apps that have web versions (Discord/Spotify), Progressive Web Apps serve as a potential alternative to their Electron versions. I am aware that Discord is a particularly bad example. Across all platforms, Discord's RAM consumption rivals Firefox and IntelliJ. It is consistently in my "Apps using significant battery consumption". They use noticeably more RAM and battery than their corresponding website versions (especially Electron vs Orion).Īs a particular, on any given day, the 12-hour battery consumption of Discord is about 2x that of IntelliJ (a java-based IDE) and 4x that of Firefox or Orion. These apps would just be permanently in Focus Mode (possibly with a small titlebar just for window controls as suggested by of the Share Menu:Īnd the app would look like this when launched (just the site in focus mode):Įlectron apps are infamous for being resource-intensive. This would create a standalone app in ~/Orion Apps/. Orion's implementation could copy from the iOS version by creating a new "Create App" option in the share menu. Here is an example video using Starbucks's Webapp: iOS Example - Streamable It works best on pages that are PWA's as it creates them as a seperate app, rather than just acting as a bookmark to a Safari page. IOS has this feature too, available using the Share Menu of Safari. Here is a video showing an example of making this feedback site an app: Chrome Example - Streamable The benefit of this is the ability to have seperate apps for each site, but still use extensions installed in the normal browser. Both Chrome and Edge have the option to create any webpage as a standalone app with its own icon in the dock, menubar name, etc. Vlad Here to add my vote for this feature as I think it would be fantastic.Īs some context, this is in addition from normal PWA's which can be installed from Chrome's url bar. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |